Thursday, February 25, 2021

A Comparison between Mygind and Kaiteki positions in administration of drops to the olfactory cleft

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Message:

https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00405-015-3701-y/MediaObjects/405_2015_3701_Fig1_HTML.jpg

https://authorea.com/users/344181/articles/470848-a-comparison-between-mygind-and-kaiteki-positions-in-administration-of-drops-to-the-olfactory-cleft/master/file/figures/Figure%201%20july/Figure%201%20july.png?1606681897

A Comparison between Mygind and Kaiteki positions in administration of drops to the olfactory cleft
Dafna G. Milk Grace C. Khong Osman H. Çam Fernando Alfaro‐Iraheta Claire Tierney Firas Kassem Samuel C. Leong
First published: 16 December 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13690
The study was performed at the Human Anatomy Resource Center, University of Liverpool, UK
Read the full text
PDFPDFTOOLS SHARE
Abstract
Objectives
Topical nasal steroids are a common treatment intervention for olfactory dysfunction. Penetration of topical treatment to the olfactory cleft (OC), such as nasal drops, is greatly dependent on the position of the head when the treatment is administered. We aimed to examine the penetrance of nasal drops to the OC in two different head positions: the Mygind (lying head back) position and the Kaiteki position.

Design and Setting
The specimens were firstly positioned in Mygind, and thereafter in Kaiteki positions. Nasal drops mixed with blue food dye were administered into the nostrils in each of the head position. Endoscopic videos were recorded, and two blinded observers scored the extent of olfactory cleft penetration (OCP) using a 4‐point scale (0 = none, 3 = heavy).

Participants
Twelve fresh‐frozen cadaver specimens.

Main outcome measures
Penetration of the dye into the OC.

Results
The mean score of nasal drops penetrance to the OC in the Mygind position was 1.34 (standard deviation, SD = 0.92), as compared to 1.76 (SD = 0.65) in the Kaiteki position. The difference in the OCP score between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > .05).

Conclusion
Both Mygind and Kaiteki head positions are reasonable options for patients considering topical nasal drops for olfaction impairment. The preference of one position over the other should be determined by patient's preference and comfort.

Open Research

Volume46, Issue2

March 2021

Pages 406-411

Related
Information
Metrics
Article has an altmetric score of 2
Details
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd


Keywords
anosmia nasal drops olfaction olfactory cleft
Publication History
Issue Online:
23 February 2021
Version of Record online:
03 January 2021
Accepted manuscript online:
16 December 2020
Manuscript accepted:
29 November 2020
Manuscript revised:
07 November 2020
Manuscript received:
18 July 2020
Download PDF
Back
Additional links
About Wiley Online Library
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Cookies
Accessibility
Help & Support
Contact Us
Opportunities
Subscription Agents
Advertisers & Corporate Partners
Connect with Wiley
The Wiley Network
Wiley Press Room
Copyright © 1999-2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reservedWiley Home Page


Rhinology
Published: 04 July 2015
The administration of nasal drops in the "Kaiteki" position allows for delivery of the drug to the olfactory cleft: a pilot study in healthy subjects
Eri Mori, Christos Merkonidis, Mandy Cuevas, Volker Gudziol, Yoshinori Matsuwaki & Thomas Hummel
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology volume 273, pages939–943(2016)Cite this article

544 Accesses

10 Citations

1 Altmetric

Metricsdetails

Abstract
Systemic treatment with corticosteroids shows therapeutic effects, few patients benefit from intranasal topical drug application, probably due to limited access of the drug to the olfactory epithelium. The aim of the present study was to investigate how drops distribute within the nasal cavity when the "Kaiteki" position is performed. Thirteen healthy volunteers participated. Subjects were lying on the side with the head tilted and the chin turned upward. Blue liquid was used to visualize the intranasal distribution of the nasal drops. The investigation was carried out using photo documentation thorough nasal endoscopy; the intranasal distribution of the dye was judged by two independent observers in both a decongested state and a natural state where no decongestants had been used. With regard to the main criterion of this study, using the "Kaiteki" position, nasal drops reached the olfactory cleft in 96 % of the decongested cases and 75 % of the cases who had not been decong ested. However, this difference was not statistically different. Because the "Kaiteki" maneuver is not too difficult to perform, it is more likely that topical steroids can be helpful in cases of olfactory loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References
1.
Landis BN, Konnerth CG, Hummel T (2004) A study on the frequency of olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope 114:1764–1769

CAS

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


2.
Brämerson A, Johansson L, Ek L, Nordin S, Bende M (2004) Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction: the Skövde population-based study. Laryngoscope 114:733–737

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


3.
Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM (2002) Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 288:2307–2312

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


4.
Damm M, Temmel A, Welge-Lüssen A, Eckel HE, Kreft MP, Klussmann JP, Gudziol H, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T (2004) Epidemiologie und Therapie von Riechstörungen in Deutschland. Österreich und der Schweiz. HNO 52:112–120

CAS

Google Scholar


5.
Heilmann S, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T (2004) Local and systemic administration of corticosteroids in the treatment of olfactory loss. Am J Rhinol 18:29–33

PubMed

Google Scholar


6.
Scheibe M, Bethge C, Witt M, Hummel T (2008) Intranasal administration of drugs. Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:643–646

Article

Google Scholar


7.
Lam K, Tan BK, Lavin JM, Meen E, Conley DB (2013) Comparison of nasal sprays and irrigations in the delivery of topical agents to the olfactory mucosa. Laryngoscope 123:2950–2957

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


8.
Miyazaki J, Matsushita H, Yamada S, Inokuchi A (2004) New method for effective instillation of nasal drops in patients with olfactory dysfunction. Pract Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 97:697–705

Article

Google Scholar


9.
Kubba H, Spinou E, Robertson A (2000) The effect of head position on the distribution of drops within the nose. Am J Rhinol 14:83–86

CAS

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


10.
Benninger MS, Hadley JA, Osguthorpe JD, Marple BF, Leopold DA, Derebery MJ, Hannley M (2004) Techniques of intranasal steroid use. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:5–24

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


11.
Shu CH, Lee PL, Shiao AS, Chen KT, Lan MY (2012) Topical corticosteroid applied with a squirt system being more effective than with nasal spray for steroid-dependent olfactory impairment. Laryngoscope 122:747–750

CAS

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


12.
Blomqvist EH, Lundblad L, Bergstedt H, Stjarne P (2003) Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study evaluating the efficacy of fluticasone propionate nasal spray for the treatment of patients with hyposmia/anosmia. Acta Otolaryngol 123:862–868

CAS

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


13.
Klimek L, Hummel T, Moll B, Kobal G, Mann WJ (1998) Lateralized and bilateral olfactory function in patients with chronic sinusitis compared with healthy control subjects. Laryngoscope 108:111–114

CAS

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


14.
Kayarkar R, Clifton NJ, Woolford TJ (2002) An evaluation of the best head position for instillation of steroid nose drops. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:18–21

CAS

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


15.
Karagama YG, Lancaster JL, Karkanevatos A, O'Sullivan G (2001) Delivery of nasal drops to the middle meatus: which is the best head position? Rhinology 39:226–229

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar


16.
Wolfensberger M, Hummel T (2002) Anti-inflammatory and surgical therapy of olfactory disorders related to sino-nasal disease. Chem Senses 27:617–622

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


17.
Pade J, Hummel T (2008) Olfactory function following nasal surgery. Laryngoscope 118:1260–1264

Article

PubMed

Google Scholar


18.
Vandenhende-Szymanski C, Hochet B, Chevalier D, Mortuaire G (2015) Olfactory cleft opacity and CT score are predictive factors of smell recovery after surgery in nasal polyposis. Rhinology 53:29–34

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar



padlock_icon.gif

View on the web

No comments:

Post a Comment

Collaboration request

Hi there How would you like to earn a 35% commission for each sale for life by selling SEO services Every website owner requires the ...