Sunday, July 10, 2022

The efficacy and safety of combined administration of intravenous and intra‐articular tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: An update meta‐analysis

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
The efficacy and safety of combined administration of intravenous and intra-articular tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: An update meta-analysis

Ten studies provided total blood loss data, seven of which used tourniquet and three of which did not use tourniquet. The pooled results showed that total blood loss in combined TXA group was significantly less than that in IV or IA TXA alone group.


Abstract

What is known and objective

This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of combined administration of intravenous (IV) and intra-articular (IA) tranexamic acid (TXA) with IV or IA TXA alone in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in July 2021. Total blood loss, transfusion rate, postoperative haemoglobin drop, drain output, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were pooled. Data were analyzed using Stata 14.0 software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020186654.

Results

Ten RCTs involving 1306 patients were included. Combined TXA group provided lower total blood loss (SMD -0.47; 95% CI −0.64 to −0.30; p < 0.001), postoperative haemoglobin drop (SMD −0.47; 95% CI −0.60 to −0.33; p < 0.001) and drain output (SMD −0.50; 95% CI −0.71 to −0.29; p = 0.009) compared with IV or IA TXA alone group. No significant difference was found in terms of transfusion rate (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.23; p = 0.137) and DVT (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.68; p = 0.293). PE data was provided by all 10 studies, but PE only occurred in one patient in IV TXA alone group.

What is new and conclusion

Combined administration of IV and IA TXA was relatively more effective in reducing total blood loss, transfusion rate, postoperative haemoglobin drop, and drain output after TKA. TXA may not increase the risk of DVT/PE, but it also needs to be monitored in clinical application.

View on Web

Immediate curative effects of exercise therapy in patients with myalgia of the masticatory muscles

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

Exercise therapy is occasionally considered as an initial treatment for temporomandibular disorders. However, pain can be exacerbated during exercise therapy.

Objective

To investigate the immediate curative effects of exercise therapy in patients with masticatory muscle myalgia.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with masticatory muscle myalgia were included. Therapists performed exercise therapy (stretched the painful masseter and/or cervical muscles along the direction of muscle contraction) in 10 rounds of traction, each lasting 10 seconds. The patient's pain-free maximum mouth opening distance and degree of pain (VAS value) before and immediately after exercise therapy were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for the subgroup comparisons.

Results

Mouth opening increased from 41 (IQR 38–43) to 46 (IQR 43–48) mm, and pain alleviation from 48 (IQR 31–56) to 21 (IQR 10–56) immediately following exercise therapy (p < 0.001 for both). None of the patients experienced pain exacerbation or reduction in mouth opening post exercise. No difference in mouth opening distance changes according to sex, painful side, painful site, and therapist were observed (p > 0.05 for all). Pain reduction was greater in patients with unilateral pain (26, IQR 12–39) than those with bilateral (13, IQR 5–25) (p = 0.019). There were no differences in the change in the degree of pain according to sex, painful site, and therapist (p > 0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Exercise therapy immediately enlarged the mouth opening distance and reduced myalgia; therefore, it could be helpful in managing masticatory muscle myalgia.

View on Web

Thursday, July 7, 2022

Automated Detection, Segmentation, and Classification of Pleural Effusion From Computed Tomography Scans Using Machine Learning

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageObjective This study trained and evaluated algorithms to detect, segment, and classify simple and complex pleural effusions on computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods For detection and segmentation, we randomly selected 160 chest CT scans out of all consecutive patients (January 2016–January 2021, n = 2659) with reported pleural effusion. Effusions were manually segmented and a negative cohort of chest CTs from 160 patients without effusions was added. A deep convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained and cross-validated (n = 224; 70%) for segmentation and tested on a separate subset (n = 96; 30%) with the same distribution of reported pleural complexity features as in the training cohort (eg, hyperdense fluid, gas, pleural thickening and loculation). On a separate consecutive cohort with a high prevalence of pleural complexity features (n = 335), a random forest model was implemented for classification of segmented effusions with Hounsfield unit thresholds, density distribution, and radiomics-based features as input. As performance measures, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curves (AUCs) for detection/classifier evaluation ( per-case level) and Dice coefficient and volume analysis for the segmentation task were used. Results Sensitivity and specificity for detection of effusion were excellent at 0.99 and 0.98, respectively (n = 96; AUC, 0.996, test data). Segmentation was robust (median Dice, 0.89; median absolute volume difference, 13 mL), irrespective of size, complexity, or contrast phase. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for classification in simple versus complex effusions were 0.67, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively. Conclusion Using a dataset with different degrees of complexity, a robust model was developed for the detection, segmentation, and classification of effusion subtypes. The algorithms are openly available at https://github.com/usb-radiology/pleuraleffusion.git.
View on Web

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Calcium Scoring: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm on a Clinical, First-Generation Dual-Source Photon Counting-Detector System

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose The aim of this study was to evaluate coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based in vitro and in vivo coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) using a novel virtual noniodine reconstruction (PureCalcium) on a clinical first-generation photon-counting detector–computed tomography system compared with virtual noncontrast (VNC) reconstructions and true noncontrast (TNC) acquisitions. Materials and Methods Although CACS and CCTA are well-established techniques for the assessment of coronary artery disease, they are complementary acquisitions, translating into increased scan time and patient radiation dose. Hence, accurate CACS derived from a single CCTA acquisition would be highly desirable. In this study, CACS based on PureCalcium, VNC, and TNC, reconstructions was evaluated in a CACS phantom and in 67 patients (70 [59/80] years, 58.2% male) undergoing CCTA on a first-generation photon counting detector–computed tomography system. Coronary artery calcium scores were quantified for the 3 reconstructions and compared using Wilcoxon test. Agreement was evaluated by Pearson and Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Classification of coronary artery calcium score categories (0, 1–10, 11–100, 101–400, and >400) was compared using Cohen κ. Results Phantom studies demonstrated strong agreement between CACSPureCalcium and CACSTNC (60.7 ± 90.6 vs 67.3 ± 88.3, P = 0.01, r = 0.98, intraclass correlation [ICC] = 0.98; mean bias, 6.6; limits of agreement [LoA], −39.8/26.6), whereas CACSVNC showed a significant underestimation (42.4 ± 75.3 vs 67.3 ± 88.3, P
View on Web

From Dose Reduction to Contrast Maximization: Can Deep Learning Amplify the Impact of Contrast Media on Brain Magnetic Resonance Image Quality? A Reader Study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageObjectives The aim of this study was to evaluate a deep learning method designed to increase the contrast-to-noise ratio in contrast-enhanced gradient echo T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions. The processed images are quantitatively evaluated in terms of lesion detection performance. Materials and Methods A total of 250 multiparametric brain MRIs, acquired between November 2019 and March 2021 at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus (Villejuif, France), were considered for inclusion in this retrospective monocentric study. Independent training (107 cases; age, 55 ± 14 years; 58 women) and test (79 cases; age, 59 ± 14 years; 41 women) samples were defined. Patients had glioma, brain metastasis, meningioma, or no enhancing lesion. Gradient echo and turbo spin echo with variable flip angles postcontrast T1 sequences were acquired in all cases. For the cases that formed the training sample, "low-dose" postcontrast gradient echo T1 images using 0.025 mmol/kg injections of contrast agent were also acquired. A deep neural network was trained to synthetically enhance the low-dose T1 acquisitions, taking standard-dose T1 MRI as reference. Once trained, the contrast enhancement network was used to process the test gradient echo T1 images. A read was then performed by 2 experienced neuroradiologist s to evaluate the original and processed T1 MRI sequences in terms of contrast enhancement and lesion detection performance, taking the turbo spin echo sequences as reference. Results The processed images were superior to the original gradient echo and reference turbo spin echo T1 sequences in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (44.5 vs 9.1 and 16.8; P 0.99). The same effect was observed when considering all lesions larger than 5 mm: sensitivity increased from 70% to 85% (P
View on Web

Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pregnancy

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Pregnancy represents a physiological state associated with increased vulnerability to severe outcomes from infectious diseases, both for the pregnant person and developing infant. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may have important health consequences for pregnant individuals, who may also be more reluctant than non-pregnant people to accept vaccination.
Methods
We sought to estimate the degree to which increased severity of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes can be attributed to pregnancy using a population-based SARS-CoV-2 case file from Ontario, Canada. Due to varying propensity to receive vaccination, and changes in dominant circulating viral strains over time, a time-matched cohort study was performed to evaluate the relative risk of severe illness in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 compared to other SARS-CoV-2 infected women of childbearing age (10 to 49 years old). Risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 outcomes was evaluated in pregnant women and time-matched non-pregnant controls using multivariable conditional logistic regression.
Results
Compared to the rest of the population, non-pregnant women of childbearing age had an elevated risk of infection (standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) 1.28), while risk of infection was reduced among pregnant women (SMR 0.43). After adjustment for confounding pregnant women had a markedly elevated risk of hospitalization (adjusted OR 4.96, 95% CI 3.86 to 6.37) and ICU admission (adjusted OR 6.58, 95% CI 3.29 to 13.18). The relative increase in hospitalization risk associated with pregnancy was greater in women without comorbidities than in those with comorbidities (P for heterogeneity 0.004).
Conclusions
Given the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnancy, risk-benefit calculus strongly favours SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant women.
View on Web

Antibody and T-cell responses 6 months after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease, on dialysis, or living with a kidney transplant

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
The immune response to COVID-19 vaccination is inferior in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and to a lesser extent in patients on dialysis or with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We assessed the immune response 6 months after mRNA-1273 vaccination in kidney patients and compared this to controls.
Methods
152 participants with CKD stages G4/5 (eGFR <30  mL/min/1.73m2), 145 participants on dialysis, 267 KTR, and 181 controls were included. SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1-specific IgG antibodies were measured by fluorescent bead-based multiplex-immunoassay, neutralizing antibodies to ancestral, Delta and Omicron (BA.1) variants by plaque reduction, and T-cell responses by IFN-γ release assay.
Results
At 6 months after vaccination S1-specific antibodies were detected in 100% of controls, 98.7% of CKD G4/5 patients, 95.1% of dialysis patients, and 56.6% of KTR. These figures were comparable to the respons e rates at 28 days, but antibody levels waned significantly. Neutralization of the ancestral and Delta variant was detected in most participants, whereas neutralization of Omicron was mostly absent. S-specific T-cell responses were detected 6 months in 75.0% of controls, 69.4% of CKD G4/5 patients, 52.6% of dialysis patients, and 12.9% of KTR. T-cell responses at 6 months were significantly lower than responses at 28 days.
Conclusions
Although seropositivity rates at 6 months were comparable to that at 28 days after vaccination, significantly decreased antibody levels and T-cell responses were observed. The combination of low antibody levels, reduced T-cell responses, and absent neutralization of the newly-emerging variants indicates the need for additional boosts or alternative vaccination strategies in KTR.
View on Web

Exploring the impact of anterior chest wall scars from implantable venous ports in adolescent survivors of cancer

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

In children with cancer, port-a-caths (ports) are commonly placed in the right anterior chest wall, leaving a visible scar when removed. The psychological impact of port scars on survivors is unknown. It is unclear whether alternative sites should be considered. We assessed the impact of port scars on pediatric cancer survivors to determine whether a change in location is indicated.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional single-center study of pediatric cancer survivors aged 13–18 years. A questionnaire explored participants' perceptions of their port scars. Four additional validated tools were used: Fitzpatrick scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index, and a Distress Thermometer.

Results

Among 100 participants (median age 15.8 years [13–18], median duration since treatment 8 years [1.5–14.8]), 75 'never/occasionally' thought about their port scars, 85 were not bothered by its location and 87 would not have preferred another site. Eleven participants were highly impacted by their scars: six thought about their scar 'everyday/all the time', four were highly bothered by its location, and nine would have preferred a different location. There was an association between the desire for different scar location and how much the location bothered participants (p < 0.0001), female sex (p = 0.03) and Patient POSAS score (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

A port scar on the anterior chest wall was not a major concern for the majority of this cohort. A minority of participants were highly impacted by the scar and its location. Advance identification of those likely to be impacted by their scars may not be possible.

View on Web

Strategies for Evaluating Anosmia Therapeutics in the COVID-19 Era

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

Two studies in this issue of JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery evaluate the use of nasal theophylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor that may promote neural olfactory signaling and recovery for postviral olfactory dysfunction (OD). The first, a dose-modification Research Letter by Lee et al was conducted in patients with non-COVID-19–related hyposmia or anosmia secondary to viral infection and confirmed by the objective University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. This open-label, dose-escalation trial provides an educational description of how to evaluate the appropriate dose for an emerging pharmacologic intervention. Specifically, the authors identified 400 mg of theophylline twice daily as a tolerated dosage. This was calculated as an equivalent oral dose of 20 mg. A phase 2 pilot study by Gupta et al was desig ned using this valuable information. Patients with suspected COVID-19–related OD completed the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test and were randomized to either theophylline or placebo nasal irrigations for 6 weeks. This study was inconclusive regarding the clinical benefit of theophylline nasal irrigations, although there was suggested improvement by subjective assessments. The authors acknowledge several limitations, including small sample size, the virtual nature of the study design and subsequent inability to conduct endoscopic nasal examinations, lack of information regarding participant COVID-19 vaccination status, lack of polymerase chain reaction–confirmed COVID-19 infection, and short-term participant follow-up. These acknowledgments are justified, and many can be overcome in subsequent studies with adequate funding and time. However, the heterogeneous nature of COVID-19 and associated research make this area of work particularly challenging. Herein, we propose several approaches to improve the rigor of OD research in the COVID-19 era.
View on Web

Safety of High-Dose Nasal Theophylline Irrigation in the Treatment of Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

This case series aims to determine the maximum tolerable dose of theophylline delivered via high-volume, low-pressure nasal saline irrigation for treatment of postviral olfactory dysfunction.
View on Web

Collaboration request

Hi there How would you like to earn a 35% commission for each sale for life by selling SEO services Every website owner requires the ...